Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) compares the costs and outcomes of two or more technologies. However, there is no consensus about which measure of effectiveness should be used in each analysis. Clinical researchers have to select an appropriate outcome for their purpose, and this choice can have d
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multinational RCT with a binary measure of effectiveness and an interacting covariate
✍ Scribed by Andrew R. Willan; Matthew E. Kowgier
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 198 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9230
- DOI
- 10.1002/hec.1289
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In a recent multinational randomized clinical trial, 1356 patients from 14 countries were randomized between two arms. The primary measure of effectiveness was 30‐day survival. Health care utilization was collected on all patients and was combined with a single country's price weights to provide patient‐level cost data. The purpose of this paper is to report the results of the cost‐effectiveness analysis for the country that provided the cost weights, so as to provide a case study for illustrating recently proposed methodologies that account for skewed cost data, the between‐country variation in treatment effects, possible interactions between treatment and baseline covariates, and the difficulty of estimated adjusted risk differences. A hierarchal model is used to account for the two sources of variation (between country and between patients, within a country). The model, which uses gamma distributions for cost data and recent methods for estimating adjusted risk differences, provides overall and country‐specific estimates of treatment effects. Model estimation is facilitated by Markov chain Monte Carlo methods using the WinBUGS software. In addition, the theory of expected value of information is used to determine if the data provided by the trial are sufficient for decision making. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Objective: Recently, new treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis (ra) patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate (mtx) have become available. given the wide variability in efficacy and costs among these different treatment options, we sought to determine their cost-effectiveness (ce
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of centralized referral of patients with advanced‐stage epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. ## METHODS. A decision‐analysis model was used to
## User satisfaction as a measure of library effectiveness has been studied by using Kantor's branching technique. Cleveland Health Sciences Library,
In a previous paper, it was argued that Societal Value measurement through person trade-off (PTO) elicitation offers a way to include the values of both general public and patients into cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). It was said that patients' values could be used to estimate the effect that var