✦ LIBER ✦

Corrigenda: Analysis of Coarsely Grouped Data from the Lognormal Distribution

✍ Scribed by Victor Hasselblad, Andrew G. Stead and Warren Galke

Book ID: 125236726
Publisher: American Statistical Association
Year: 1982
Tongue: English
Weight: 236 KB
Volume: 77
Category: Article
ISSN: 0162-1459
DOI: 10.2307/2287358

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Analysis of Coarsely Grouped Data from t

Analysis of Coarsely Grouped Data from the Lognormal Distribution

✍ Victor Hasselblad, Andrew G. Stead and Warren Galke 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 American Statistical Association 🌐 English ⚖ 848 KB

Estimation of Plant Biomass from Quadrat

Estimation of Plant Biomass from Quadrat Data Using the Lognormal Distribution

✍ Gary C. White 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Society for Range Management 🌐 English ⚖ 199 KB

Corrigenda: The Combination of Probabili

Corrigenda: The Combination of Probabilities Arising from Data in Discrete Distributions

✍ H. O. Lancaster 📂 Article 📅 1950 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 89 KB

Analysis of data from focus groups: Grou

Analysis of data from focus groups: Group interaction — the added dimension

✍ Felicity Smith 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 422 KB

Comparing normal, lognormal and Weibull

Comparing normal, lognormal and Weibull distributions for fitting diameter data from Akashmoni plantations in the north-eastern region of Bangladesh

✍ Kayes, I; Deb, JC; Comeau, P; Das, S 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 470 KB

Analysis of data from group-randomized t

Analysis of data from group-randomized trials with repeat observations on the same groups

✍ David M. Murray; Peter J. Hannan; Russell D. Wolfinger; William L. Baker; James 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB 👁 3 views

This study used Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of alternative models for the analysis of group-randomized trials having more than two time intervals for data collection. The major distinction among the models tested was the sampling variance of the intervention effect. In the mi