✦ LIBER ✦

Correction to 'On the Detection of Stochastic Signals in Additive Normal Noise - Part I'

✍ Scribed by Middleton, D.

Book ID: 118698695
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Year: 1957
Tongue: English
Weight: 237 KB
Volume: 3
Category: Article
ISSN: 0096-1000
DOI: 10.1109/tit.1957.1057429

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Correction to "On the Detection of Stoch

Correction to "On the Detection of Stochastic Signals in Additive Normal Noise - Part I"

✍ Middleton, D. 📂 Article 📅 1960 🏛 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB

The sequential estimation and detection

The sequential estimation and detection of signals in normal noise. I

✍ Ivan Selin 📂 Article 📅 1964 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 940 KB

Comments on "On singular and nonsingular

Comments on "On singular and nonsingular optimum (Bayes) tests for the detection of normal stochastic signals in normal noise" by Middleton, D.

✍ Selin, I. 📂 Article 📅 1962 🏛 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 101 KB

Correction to 'Optimum Detection of Rada

Correction to 'Optimum Detection of Radar Signals in Noise, with Application to Scatter-Multipath Communication I'

✍ Price, R. 📂 Article 📅 1957 🏛 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 237 KB

Signal-to-noise ratio in direct-detectio

Signal-to-noise ratio in direct-detection mid-infrared Random-Modulation Continuous-Wave lidar in the presence of colored additive noise

✍ Taflove, Allen; Rybaltowski, Adam 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Optical Society of America 🌐 English ⚖ 185 KB

On the Importance of Random Error in the

On the Importance of Random Error in the Study of Probability Judgment. Part II: Applying the Stochastic Judgment Model to Detect Systematic Trends

✍ DAVID V. BUDESCU; THOMAS S. WALLSTEN; WING TUNG AU 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 247 KB 👁 2 views

Erev, Wallsten, and Budescu (1994) and Budescu, Erev, and Wallsten (1997) demonstrated that over-and undercon®dence often observed in judgment studies may be due, in part, to the presence of random error and its eects on the analysis of the judgments. To illustrate this fact they showed that a ge