𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials: an application to the ATBC study

✍ Scribed by Pasi A. Korhonen; Nan M. Laird; Juni Palmgren


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
171 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6715

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Di!erent methods for estimating the e!ect of treatment actually received in a longitudinal placebocontrolled trial with non-compliance are discussed. Total mortality from the ATBC Study is used as an illustrative example. In the ATBC Study some 25 per cent of the participants dropped out from active follow-up prior to the scheduled end of the study. The &intention-to-treat' analysis showed an increased death risk in the beta-carotene arm when compared with the no beta-carotene arm. Owing to considerable non-compliance it is also of interest to estimate the e!ect of beta-carotene actually received. We use a simple model for the treatment action and discuss three methods for estimation of the treatment e!ect under the model } the &intention-to-treat' approach, the &as-treated' approach and the g-estimation approach. These approaches are compared in a simulation study under di!erent settings for non-compliance. Finally, the data from the ATBC Study are analysed using the proposed methods.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Using the bootstrap for estimation in gr
✍ Michael LeBlanc; John Crowley πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 159 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

We investigate a resampling method for bias correction in group sequential designs with censored survival data using logrank testing. The method draws nested bootstrap samples of di!erent sizes from the observed data in order to mimic the large sample independent increment property of statistics res

Is the Wish to Participate in a Cancer R
✍ Gunilla Berglund; Christina Bolund; Ulla-Lena Gustafsson; Per-Olow SjΓΆdΓ©n πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 110 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

In parallel with a randomized study of the 'starting again' rehabilitation program for cancer patients, a group of 73 non-participants were monitored (another 20 patients declined monitoring). In comparison with participants (intervention + control), gender, diagnosis, and 10 out of 18 dependent mea