This monograph develops a method of creating convenient coordinate systems for game theory that will allow readers to more easily understand, analyze, and create games at various levels of complexity. By identifying the unique characterization of games that separates the individual’s strategic inter
Coordinate Systems for Games: Simplifying the "me" and "we" Interactions (Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications)
✍ Scribed by Daniel T. Jessie, Donald G. Saari
- Publisher
- Birkhäuser
- Year
- 2019
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 217
- Series
- Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications
- Edition
- 1st ed. 2019
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
✦ Table of Contents
Preface
Book Outline
Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Review
1.2 An Inherent Dynamic
1.2.1 Nash Dynamics
1.2.2 Structure of 2times2 Games
1.3 Standard Games
1.3.1 Games with One Nash Cell
1.3.2 Games with Two Nash Cells
1.4 Mixed Strategies
1.4.1 Games Without Nash Cells
1.4.2 Finding the Probabilities
1.4.3 Matching Pennies
1.4.4 Another Source of Mixed Strategies
1.5 Nash Theorem and Defining Generic and Degenerate Settings
2 Two-Player, Two-Strategy Games
2.1 Preview
2.2 Introduction
2.3 The Nash Decomposition
2.3.1 The Nash, or me'' Component
2.3.2 The Behavioralwe'' Factor, and Kernel Terms
2.3.3 More Examples
2.4 Gaining Intuition; Comparing Examples
2.4.1 The Nash Component and Game Dynamic
2.4.2 Behavior Component and Cooperation
2.4.3 What Does All of This Mean?
2.4.4 Creating Exotic Examples
2.4.5 Does Size Matter?
2.5 Structure of Standard Games
2.5.1 Prisoner's Dilemma
2.5.2 Collective Action
2.5.3 Cooperation
2.5.4 Hawk–Dove
2.5.5 Battle of the Sexes
2.5.6 Stag Hunt
2.6 Risk Versus Payoff Dominance
2.6.1 Payoff Dominance
2.6.2 Risk Dominance
2.6.3 Examples
2.6.4 A 50–50 Choice
2.7 Recap
3 Consequences
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Symmetric Games
3.3 Zero-Sum and Identical Play
3.3.1 CoCo Solutions
3.3.2 Zero-Sum Games
3.3.3 Identical Play Games
3.4 Using Vectors to Analyze and Design Games
3.4.1 Review of Vector Analysis
3.4.2 Intuition and a Vector Basis
3.4.3 Designing Games
3.4.4 Utility Functions
3.4.5 Congestion and Potential Games
3.4.6 Zero-Sum, Identical Play Games
3.5 Missing Terms When Analyzing Beliefs
3.6 Roadmap of 2times2 Games
3.6.1 The Nash Portion Is a Square; Ok, A Torus
3.6.2 Likelihood of Different Strategic Structures
3.6.3 Extending a Monderer–Shapley Observation
3.6.4 Why Not Symmetric, Antisymmetric?
3.7 The Behavioral Portion and a Circle
4 Two-Person Multi-strategy Games
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Decomposition
4.2.1 More on Risk and Payoff Dominance
4.2.2 More on Zero-Sum and Identical Play Games
4.3 Examples
4.3.1 Ultimatum Game
4.3.2 Legislator Pay Raise Game
4.4 Modeling and Creating Games
4.4.1 Differences in the mathcalGB Structure
4.4.2 Dimension Counting
4.5 Structure of Two-Person Games
4.5.1 Where's Waldo?
4.5.2 Next Response Dynamic
4.6 Structure of the Next Response Dynamic
4.6.1 Number of Hyperbolic Cells
4.6.2 The Next Response Dynamic
4.7 Some Games
4.7.1 Colonel Blotto
4.7.2 Rock-Paper-Scissors
4.7.3 Those Repulsive Cells
4.8 Computing Mixed Equilibria
4.8.1 Help from the Decomposition
4.8.2 Moving to 3times3 Blocks
5 Extensive Form Games
5.1 What Is with What?
5.2 Centipede Game
5.3 Equilibria and Subgame Equilibrium
5.4 Nature's Involvement in a 2times2 Game
5.5 From a Decomposition to Coordinates
5.5.1 Nash Component for the General Game
5.5.2 Changing Probabilities
5.5.3 The Behavioral Terms for the General Game
5.6 Paradise for Designers!
5.7 Details of the Decomposition
5.7.1 Subgames and Decisions
5.7.2 Player 2
5.7.3 Player 1
5.7.4 Alternative Basis for Behavioral Coordinates
6 Multiplayer Games
6.1 Hawk–Dove–Dove
6.1.1 Analyzing Hawk–Dove–Dove
6.1.2 Designing a Hawk–Dove–Dove Game
6.2 Nash Dynamic Structure
6.2.1 Adding Complexity
6.2.2 Those Retaliatory Strategies
6.3 New Symmetries
6.3.1 A Wedding Between Voting and Game Theory
6.3.2 Another Designer's Delight! Coalition-Free Nash Points?
6.3.3 More Strategies, More Cycles
6.4 Comments
7 The Underlying Mathematics
7.1 Decompositions
7.2 Definitions
7.3 Symmetry
7.4 Algebraic Structure of Games
7.4.1 Symmetries of the Space of Games
7.4.2 Homomorphisms
7.4.3 Module
7.5 Best Response Algebraic Structures
7.6 Decompositions of Games
7.7 Finding the Structure
7.7.1 Conjugacy Classes
7.7.2 Nash Decomposition
7.7.3 Row-and-Column Decomposition–Potential Games
7.7.4 Pareto Decomposition–CoCo Solutions
7.8 Conclusion
8 Summary
Appendix References
Index
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p><span>This book introduces game theory as a means to conceptualize, model, and analyze cyber deception. Drawing upon a collection of deception research from the past 10 years, the authors develop a taxonomy of six species of defensive cyber deception. Three of these six species are highlighted in
<p>The chapters in this volume explore how various methods from game theory can be utilized to optimize security and risk-management strategies. Emphasizing the importance of connecting theory and practice, they detail the steps involved in selecting, adapting, and analyzing game-theoretic models i
<p></p><p>The goal of this book is to elaborate on the main principles of the theory of the Berge equilibrium by answering the following two questions: What are the basic properties of the Berge equilibrium? Does the Berge equilibrium exist, and how can it be calculated?</p> <p>The Golden Rule of et
<p></p><p><span>The goal of this book is to elaborate on the main principles of the theory of the Berge equilibrium by answering the following two questions: What are the basic properties of the Berge equilibrium? Does the Berge equilibrium exist, and how can it be calculated?</span></p><p><span>The