𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Convective-diffusive model of two-dimensional root growth and proliferation

✍ Scribed by B. Acock; Ya. A. Pachepsky


Publisher
Springer
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
777 KB
Volume
180
Category
Article
ISSN
0032-079X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Simulations of crop productivity and environmental quality depend strongly on the root activity model used. Flexible, generic root system models are needed that can easily be coupled to various process-based soil models and can easily be modified to test various hypotheses about how roots respond to their environment. In this paper, we develop a convective-diffusive model of root growth and proliferation, and use it to test some of these hypotheses with data on the growth of roots on potted chrysanthemum cuttings. The proliferation of roots is viewed as a result of a diffusion-like gradient-driven propagation in all directions and convection-like propagation downwards caused by geotropism. The finite element method was used to solve the boundary problem for the convective-diffusive equation. To test hypotheses, we wrote modules in a way that caused a test parameter to be zero, should the hypothesis be rejected. These modules were added or removed to test each hypothesis in turn and in various combinations. The model explained 92% of the variation in the experimental data of Chen and Lieth (1993) on root growth of potted chrysanthemum cuttings. For this dataset the following hypotheses were accepted: (1) root diffusivity (colonization of new soil) did not depend on root density, (2) there was no geotropic trend in root development, (3) potential root growth increased linearly with root density, (4) there were (at least) two classes of roots with different rates of growth and proliferation, and (5) potential root growth rate decreased with distance from the plant stem base.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Modelling of Root Growth and Bending in
✍ H.E. Zieschang; P. Brain; P.W. Barlow πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 411 KB

A special co-ordinate system is developed for modelling the gravitropic bending of plant roots. It is based on the Local Theory of Curves in differential geometry and describes, in one dimension, growth events that may actually occur in two, or even three, dimensions. With knowledge of the spatial d

Effect of diffusive and convective subst
✍ Cristian Picioreanu; Mark C. M. Van Loosdrecht; Joseph J. Heijnen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 428 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

A two-dimensional model for quantitative evaluation of the effect of convective and diffusive substrate transport on biofilm heterogeneity was developed. The model includes flow computation around the irregular biofilm surface, substrate mass transfer by convection and diffusion, biomass growth, and

Models of two-dimensional electrocrystal
✍ R.G. Barradas; E. Bosco πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 892 KB

Three novel models of two-dimensional (2-D) electrocrystallization are presented. These models involve coupling of electrocrystallixation with diffusion. Two of them include additional couplings to metal dissolution from the electrode surface. Potentiostatic current-time transients resulting from th

Antigen-Antibody Binding and Mass Transp
✍ R.W. Glaser πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 888 KB

The kinetics of binding and dissociation between a soluble analyte and an immobilized ligand on or near a surface are described numerically by an iterative computer model. The model is applied to a microflow chamber which is used for surface plasmon resonance measurements. It calculates diffusion pe

Differences in the lower troposphere in
✍ J. C. Petch; P. N. Blossey; C .S. Bretherton πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 132 KB

## Abstract This short note discusses key deficiencies in two‐dimensional (2D) cloud‐resolving model (CRM) simulations. Results differ significantly from three‐dimensional (3D) simulations in the low‐level humidity structure and associated fields. These differences are consistent across two differe