𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Controllability does not imply stabilizability

✍ Scribed by K.Maciej Przyłuski

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1988
Tongue
English
Weight
328 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
0167-6911

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

D∗(R;⩽) does not imply D1∗
D∗(R;⩽) does not imply D1∗
✍ Carlos R. Borges 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 132 KB

We prove that the cyclic monotonically normal space T of Rudin is not a &space. Consequently, T has the monotone extension property but does not have 0; or D\* (IF!; +; cch). This answers some questions of van Douwen. 0 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

SH plus CH does not imply stationary ant
SH plus CH does not imply stationary antichains
✍ Chaz Schlindwein 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 467 KB

We build a model in which the continuum hypothesis and Suslin's hypothesis are true, yet there is an Aronszajn tree with no stationary antichain.

X* plus Axiom A Does Not Imply No-Cycle
X* plus Axiom A Does Not Imply No-Cycle
✍ C.Z. Li; L. Wen 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 211 KB

An example is presented to indicate that \(x^{*}\) plus Axiom A does not imply the no-cycle condition. \(\hat{\Gamma} 1995\) Academic Press. Inc.