๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Contract modifications and the basis behavior of live cattle futures

โœ Scribed by James E. Newsome; George H. K. Wang; M. E. Boyd; Marty J. Fuller


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
194 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the basis behavior of the Live Cattle Futures contract at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) before and after the 1995 contract changes. Additionally, an alternative method of basis calculation utilizing weighted mean futures prices versus settlement futures prices was compared to determine which method provides a better representation of the basis level.

Within a regression model with heteroskedascity error framework, we found that the level of nearby basis in the period after June 1995 has shifted lower and the average monthly open interest of net commercial long positions has substantially increased after the contract modifications. These empirical results are consistent with the notion that more long activity entered the market in response to the contract modifications. Additionally, an alternative (new) measure of basis calculation (cash price minus weighted mean futures price) produced similar results to two other commonly used measures. In conclusion, the 1995 contract changes have neither increased nor decreased the volatility of live cattle basis. ยฉ 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 24:557โ€“590, 2004


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Forecasting the nearby basis of live cat
โœ Shi-Miin Liu; B. Wade Brorsen; Charles M. Oellermann; Apul L. Farris ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 756 KB

Numerous articles have provided statistical models of cash-futures basis for live cattle [e.g., Ehrich (1972);; ; ; l and for other commodities [e.g., Trapp and Eilrich ( 199 1 ); Tilley and Campbell ( 1 988)l. Researchers have generally found it more difficult to model basis as the futures contract

Ex ante basis risk in the live hog futur
โœ Garcia, Philip; Sanders, Dwight R. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 977 KB

Forecasting the cash-futures basis for agricultural commodities is an important aspect of a successful marketing strategy [Bobst (1974), Garcia and Good (1983), Chicago Mercantile Exchange (19SS)l. Short hedgers are long the basis and unanticipated basis movements can adversely affect the net price

The forward pricing efficiency of the li
โœ G. D. Koppenhaver ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1983 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 881 KB

A tution reflects all available information at any point in time such that only the arrival of new unanticipated information leads to a change in price. However, the notion of an efficient market is often confused with the hypothesis that forward prices represent unbiased estimates of future spot pr

The performance of live cattle futures a
โœ Robert W. Kolb; Gerald D. Gay ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1983 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 514 KB

T performance of the live cattle futures contract traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. In his article, "A Report on the Systematic Downward %as in Live Cattle Futures Prices," Helmuth (1981) ". . . reports on the discovery of a technique which predicted certain drops in live cattle futures pri

Rational expectations and market efficie
โœ Matthew P. Schaefer; Robert J. Myers; Stephen R. Koontz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 135 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract The role of proprietary information in forecasting and market efficiency in the U.S. live cattle futures market is investigated. Using a unique proprietary data source collected by a private firm, we test whether the initial estimates in the USDA __Cattle on Feed Report__ and the Knight