✦ LIBER ✦

Contextual influences on the decision calculus: A cross-national examination of proximity voting

✍ Scribed by Shane P. Singh

Book ID: 113597378
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 215 KB
Volume: 29
Category: Article
ISSN: 0261-3794
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.014

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Influence of Proximity to a National

The Influence of Proximity to a National Forest on Emotions and Fire-Management Decisions

✍ Joanne Vining; Melinda S. Merrick 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 203 KB

The Nature and Implications of Contextua

The Nature and Implications of Contextual Influences on Transformational Leadership: A Conceptual Examination

✍ Badrinarayan Shankar Pawar and Kenneth K. Eastman 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Academy of Management 🌐 English ⚖ 550 KB

The contextual effects of social capital

The contextual effects of social capital on health: A cross-national instrumental variable analysis

✍ Daniel Kim; Christopher F. Baum; Michael L. Ganz; S.V. Subramanian; Ichiro Kawac 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 292 KB

Examining a model of vertical accountabi

Examining a model of vertical accountability: A cross-national study of the influence of information access on the control of corruption

✍ Jeannine E. Relly 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 395 KB

National Profiles of classroom quality a

National Profiles of classroom quality and family involvement: A multilevel examination of proximal influences on Head Start children's school readiness

✍ Rebecca J. Bulotsky-Shearer; Xiaoli Wen; Ann-Marie Faria; Debbie L. Hahs-Vaughn; 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 398 KB

A preliminary framework in examining the

A preliminary framework in examining the influence of outcome information on evaluations of auditor decisions

✍ D. Jordan Lowe; Philip M.J. Reckers 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 503 KB

The expectation gap can be considered as a function of two components . The first component represents the difference between ex ante judgments of auditors and nonauditors who do not have outcome knowledge . The second component depicts the difference between nonauditor judgments that are made with