✦ LIBER ✦

Contact anisotropy and coordination number for a granular assembly: A comparison of distinct-element-method simulations and theory

✍ Scribed by La Ragione, Luigi; Magnanimo, Vanessa

Book ID: 121243142
Publisher: The American Physical Society
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 283 KB
Volume: 85
Category: Article
ISSN: 1063-651X
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.031304

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Vibrating powder beds: a comparison of e

Vibrating powder beds: a comparison of experimental and Distinct Element Method simulated data

✍ A.J Matchett; T Yanagida; Y Okudaira; S Kobayashi 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 810 KB

Introduction of a Texture Component Crys

Introduction of a Texture Component Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Method for Anisotropy Simulations

✍ Z. Zhao; F. Roters; W. Mao; D. Raabe 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 681 KB

A finite element method for contact prob

A finite element method for contact problems of solid bodies—Part I. Theory and validation

✍ S.K. Chan; I.S. Tuba 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 469 KB

A comparison of a finite element method

A comparison of a finite element method and a finite difference method for transient simulation of a gas pipeline

✍ Andrzej J. Osiadacz; Mohamed Yedroudj 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 626 KB

A comparison between the distinct elemen

A comparison between the distinct element method and the finite element method for analysis of the stability of an excavation in jointed rock

✍ Charles Fairhurst; Juemin Pei 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 676 KB

A comparison of the finite-difference an

A comparison of the finite-difference and the finite-element methods for simulating unstable displacements

✍ Santanu Khataniar; Ekwere J. Peters 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 983 KB

The finite-difference and the finite-element methods are the two most commonly used numerical methods in reservoir simulation. A comparative study of the two methods in compositional and noncompositionai simulations is presented. The comparisons are based on grid orientation effect and computational