Constitutions worldwide inevitably have 'invisible' features: they have silences and lacunae, unwritten or conventional underpinnings, and social and political dimensions not apparent to certain observers. The Invisible Constitution in Comparative Perspective helps us understand these dimensions to
Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective
β Scribed by Sally J. Kenney, William M. Reisinger, John C. Reitz (eds.)
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 274
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter....Pages i-xix
Introduction: Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective....Pages 1-7
Constitutional Dialogues: Protecting Human Rights in France, Germany, Italy and Spain....Pages 8-41
Experimental Constitutionalism: A Comparative Analysis of The Institutional Bases of Rights Enforcement in Post-Communist Hungary....Pages 42-61
Political Economy and Abstract Review in Germany, France and the United States....Pages 62-88
A Comparative Study of the Constitutional Protection of Hate Speech in Canada and the United States: A Search for Explanations....Pages 89-118
Inter cultural Citizenship: Statutory Interpretation and Belonging in Britain....Pages 119-142
The Judges of the Court of Justice of the European Communities....Pages 143-171
Legal Orientations and the Rule of Law in Post-Soviet Russia....Pages 172-192
The Success of Judicial Review....Pages 193-219
Back Matter....Pages 220-254
β¦ Subjects
Comparative Politics; Political Science; Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<i>Approaching Dialogue</i> has its primary focus on the theoretical understanding and empirical analysis of talk-in-interaction. It deals with conversation in general as well as talk within institutions against a backdrop of Conversation Analysis, context-based discourse analysis, social pragmatics
Debates on immigrant integration often center on "national models of integration," a concept that reflects the desire of both researchers and policy makers to find common ground. This book challenges the idea that there has ever been a coherent or consistent Dutch model of integration and asserts th
<div> <p>Debates on immigrant integration often center on βnational models of integration,β a concept that reflects the desire of both researchers and policy makers to find common ground. This book challenges the idea that there has ever been a coherent or consistent Dutch model of integration and a
Debates on immigrant integration often center on βnational models of integration,β a concept that reflects the desire of both researchers and policy makers to find common ground. This book challenges the idea that there has ever been a coherent or consistent Dutch model of integration and asserts th