New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax: Constituent Syntax (Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora) is the third of four volumes dealing with the long-term evolution of Latin syntax, roughly from the 4th century BCE up to the 6th century CE. Essentially an extension of Volume 2, Volume
Constituent Syntax: Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora
β Scribed by Philip Baldi
- Publisher
- De Gruyter Mouton
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 553
- Series
- Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [Tilsm]
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax: Constituent Syntax (Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora) is the third of four volumes dealing with the long-term evolution of Latin syntax, roughly from the 4th century BCE up to the 6th century CE. Essentially an extension of Volume 2, Volume 3 concentrates on additional subsentential syntactic phenomena and their long-term evolution from the earliest texts up to the Late Latin period. Included in Volume 3 are detailed treatments of quantification, numerals, possession, and deixis/anaphora. As in the other volumes, the non-technical style and extensive illustration with classical examples makes the content readable and immediately useful to the widest audience. Key features first publication to investigates the long-term syntactic history of Latin generally accessible to linguists and non-linguists theoretically coherent, formulated in functional-typological terms does not require reading fluency in Latin, since all examples are translated into English
β¦ Subjects
Π―Π·ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅;ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ;ΠΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°;
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p><em>New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax: Constituent Syntax (Quantification, Numerals, Possession, Anaphora) </em>is the third of four volumes dealing with the long-term evolution of Latin syntax, roughly from the 4th century BCE up to the 6th century CE. Essentially an extension of Volum
In this work, Ken Safir develops a comprehensive theory on the role of anaphora in syntax. First, he contends that the complementary distribution of forms that support the anaphoric readings is not accidental, contrary to most current thinking, but rather should be derived from a principle, one that
In this work, Ken Safir develops a comprehensive theory on the role of anaphora in syntax. First, he contends that the complementary distribution of forms that support the anaphoric readings is not accidental, contrary to most current thinking, but rather should be derived from a principle, one that