𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Congenital defects among liveborn infants with Down syndrome

✍ Scribed by Mario A. Cleves; Charlotte A. Hobbs; Phillip A. Cleves; John M. Tilford; T.M. Bird; James M. Robbins


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
90 KB
Volume
79
Category
Article
ISSN
1542-0752

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many infants with Down syndrome (DS) have co‐occurring congenital malformations requiring intensive surgical and medical management. To anticipate the care needed by these infants, providers and parents require accurate information about birth defects that may be present. This article uses a unique national hospital discharge dataset to identify the rate at which structural birth defects are identified among liveborn infants with DS. METHODS: ICD‐9‐CM diagnosis codes for data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project were used to identify infants with and without DS, and to classify birth defects. The study population consisted of liveborn infants discharged from the hospital from 1993 through 2002. ORs for the association between the occurrence of congenital malformations and the presence of DS were computed using logistic regression models for survey data. RESULTS: Discharge data included 11,372 DS and 7,884,209 non‐DS births, representing national estimates of 43,463 DS and 39,716,469 non‐DS births respectively. In addition to congenital heart defects that co‐occurred most often in DS infants compared to infants without DS, the risks for gastrointestinal malformations (OR 67.07), genitourinary malformations (OR 3.62), orofacial malformations (OR 5.63), and abdominal wall malformations (OR 3.25) were also elevated in infants with DS. There was no difference in the risk of spina bifida between infants with and without DS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first nationally representative compilation of the co‐occurrence of congenital malformations associated with DS. This information may assist providers and parents in their attempts to understand and prepare for the true burden of this condition. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 79:657–663, 2007. Β© 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prenatal exposures and congenital heart
✍ Fixler, David E.; Threlkeld, Norma πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 63 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are important differences in maternal and environmental prenatal risk factors between liveborn Down syndrome infants with congenital heart defects and Down syndrome infants without heart defects. Using a case control study design, we evaluated

Trisomy 22 in a liveborn infant with mul
✍ McPherson, Elspeth ;Stetka, Daniel G. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 381 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

We report on the third confirmed case of trisomy 22 in a liveborn infant. High-resolution banding studies ruled out translocations such as the relatively common t(11;22). The infant shared many manifestations with other reported cases of trisomy 22 (e.g., growth deficiency, microcephaly, micrognathi

Carmi syndrome with congenital heart def
✍ Mustafa Aydin; Aysegul Zenciroglu; Ayhan Yaman; Utku Arman Orun; Nilufer Arda; A πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 83 KB πŸ‘ 1 views