Congenital defects among liveborn infants with Down syndrome
β Scribed by Mario A. Cleves; Charlotte A. Hobbs; Phillip A. Cleves; John M. Tilford; T.M. Bird; James M. Robbins
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 90 KB
- Volume
- 79
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1542-0752
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many infants with Down syndrome (DS) have coβoccurring congenital malformations requiring intensive surgical and medical management. To anticipate the care needed by these infants, providers and parents require accurate information about birth defects that may be present. This article uses a unique national hospital discharge dataset to identify the rate at which structural birth defects are identified among liveborn infants with DS. METHODS: ICDβ9βCM diagnosis codes for data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project were used to identify infants with and without DS, and to classify birth defects. The study population consisted of liveborn infants discharged from the hospital from 1993 through 2002. ORs for the association between the occurrence of congenital malformations and the presence of DS were computed using logistic regression models for survey data. RESULTS: Discharge data included 11,372 DS and 7,884,209 nonβDS births, representing national estimates of 43,463 DS and 39,716,469 nonβDS births respectively. In addition to congenital heart defects that coβoccurred most often in DS infants compared to infants without DS, the risks for gastrointestinal malformations (OR 67.07), genitourinary malformations (OR 3.62), orofacial malformations (OR 5.63), and abdominal wall malformations (OR 3.25) were also elevated in infants with DS. There was no difference in the risk of spina bifida between infants with and without DS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first nationally representative compilation of the coβoccurrence of congenital malformations associated with DS. This information may assist providers and parents in their attempts to understand and prepare for the true burden of this condition. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 79:657β663, 2007. Β© 2007 WileyβLiss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are important differences in maternal and environmental prenatal risk factors between liveborn Down syndrome infants with congenital heart defects and Down syndrome infants without heart defects. Using a case control study design, we evaluated
We report on the third confirmed case of trisomy 22 in a liveborn infant. High-resolution banding studies ruled out translocations such as the relatively common t(11;22). The infant shared many manifestations with other reported cases of trisomy 22 (e.g., growth deficiency, microcephaly, micrognathi