✦ LIBER ✦

Conflicts and decisions in the search for inherently safer process options

✍ Scribed by Dennis C. Hendershot

Publisher: American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 534 KB
Volume: 14
Category: Article
ISSN: 1066-8527
DOI: 10.1002/prs.680140109

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The use of multi-criteria decision analy

The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study

✍ Carlos A. Bana E Costa 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 544 KB

## Abstract Public resource allocation often requires the management of conflicting objectives of multiple policy actors at different spatial levels. An example is the case study on which this paper is based: the definition of an investment policy in new inter‐municipal road‐links in the Lisbon Met

The fallacy of comparing surgeons with p

The fallacy of comparing surgeons with pilots in the search for safer surgical training

✍ S. Isreb; S. E. Attwood 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 57 KB 👁 1 views

Novel Process Options for the Applicatio

Novel Process Options for the Application of Zeolites in Supercritical Fluids and Ionic Liquids

✍ Roger Glaeser 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 18 KB 👁 2 views

The variational calculus and approximati

The variational calculus and approximation in policy space for Markovian decision processes

✍ Paul J Schweitzer 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 519 KB

File handling for detail and extent and

File handling for detail and extent and for subtasks in the implementation of decision processes

✍ J.R.B. Cockett 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 643 KB

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in

Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals || The Decision-Making Process for Reviewed Manuscripts

✍ Hames, Irene 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Blackwell Publishing 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB 👁 3 views

This comprehensive yet concise book provides a thorough and complete guide to every aspect of managing the peer review process for scientific journals. Until now, little information has been readily available on how this important facet of the journal publishing process should be conducted properly.