Recently, a number of papers have brought up the issue of how to make cost-effectiveness (CE) studies stochastic, i.e. how to obtain confidence intervals for CE ratios. In this note we present a bootstrap procedure for estimating bias-corrected confidence intervals for CE ratios. The bootstrap proce
Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: An application of Fieller's theorem
β Scribed by Andrew R. Willan; Bernie J. O'Brien
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 671 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9230
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Application of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is growing rapidly in health care. Two general approaches to analysis are differentiated by the type of data available: (i) deterministic models based upon secondary analysis of retrospective data from one or more trials and other sources; and (ii) stochastic analyses in which the design of a randomized controlled trial is adapted to collect prospectively patient-specific data on costs and effectiveness. An important methodological difference between these two approaches is in how uncertainty is handled. Deterministic CEA models typically rely upon sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of findings to alternative assumptions, whereas stochastic (CEA) analysis, as part of prospective studies, permits the use of conventional statistical methods on the cost and effectiveness data for both inference (hypothesis testing) and estimation. This paper presents a procedure for the statistical analysis of cost-effectiveness data, with specific application to those studies for which effectiveness is measured as a binary outcome. Specifically, Fieller's Theorem was used to calculate confidence intervals for ratios of the two random variables of between-treatment differences in observed costs and effectiveness, i.e. the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We evaluated four methods for computing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios developed from randomized controlled trials: the box method, the Taylor series method, the nonparametric bootstrap method and the Fieller theorem method. We performed a Monte Carlo experiment to compare these
Cost-effectiveness ratios usually appear as point estimates without confidence intervals, since the numerator and denominator are both stochastic and one cannot estimate the variance of the estimator exactly. The recent literature, however, stresses the importance of presenting confidence intervals
The statistic of interest in most health economic evaluations is the incremental cost-e!ectiveness ratio. Since the variance of a ratio estimator is intractable, the health economics literature has suggested a number of alternative approaches to estimating con"dence intervals for the cost-e!ectivene