In this two-volume set Leonard Talmy defines the field of cognitive semantics. He approaches the question of how language organizes conceptual material both at a general level and by analyzing a crucial set of particular conceptual domains: space and time, motion and location, causation and force in
Concept Structuring Systems (Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1)
β Scribed by Leonard Talmy
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 574
- Edition
- illustrated edition
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In this two-volume set Leonard Talmy defines the field of cognitive semantics. He approaches the question of how language organizes conceptual material both at a general level and by analyzing a crucial set of particular conceptual domains: space and time, motion and location, causation and force interaction, and attention and viewpoint. Talmy maintains that these are among the most fundamental parameters by which language structures conception. By combining these conceptual domains into an integrated whole, Talmy shows, we advance our understanding of the overall conceptual and semantic structure of natural language. Volume 1 examines the fundamental systems by which language shapes concepts. Volume 2 sets forth typologies according to which concepts are structured and the processes by which they are structured.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this two-volume set Leonard Talmy defines the field of cognitive semantics. He approaches the question of how language organizes conceptual material both at a general level and by analyzing a crucial set of particular conceptual domains: space and time, motion and location, causation and force in
In this two-volume set Leonard Talmy defines the field of cognitive semantics. He approaches the question of how language organizes conceptual material both at a general level and by analyzing a crucial set of particular conceptual domains: space and time, motion and location, causation and force in
<p>Our ontology as well as our grammar are, as Quine affirms, ineliminable parts of our conceptual contribution to our theory of the world. It seems impossible to think of entiΒ ties, individuals and events without specifying and constructing, in advance, a specific language that must be used in ord
Unpublished technical report, 2009. β 6 p.<div class="bb-sep"></div>The recent emergence of simulation-based accounts of language understanding (e.g. Barsalou et al. To appear; Zwaan 2004) has provided a promising perspective on the relationship between language and conceptual structure in facilitat
// In: Further Insights into Semantics and Lexicography, edited by Ulf Magnusson, Henryk Kardela and Adam Glaz. β Lublin, Poland: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2007. β pp. 11-42.<div class="bb-sep"></div>In this paper I am concerned with the nature of word βmeaningβ and their semantic contribution in combinatio