Cylinders of a very pure graphitized porous carbon were reacted to 10, 'LO and 30 per cent burnoff at 1030Β°C Based upon pore size distributions obtained from the unburned carbon and from radial sections of the cylinders at each percentage burnoff, the major portion of early pore development apparent
Computer Simulations of Adsorption Characteristics of Carbon Dioxide in Slit Graphite Pores
β Scribed by Qingyuan Yang; Chongli Zhong
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 901 KB
- Volume
- 82
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-4034
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
An extensive grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation has been performed to study the adsorption behavior and the orientational structure of CO~2~ confined in slit graphite pores, with a wide pore width range of 0.61 to 3.04 nm and pressures up to 3.41 MPa. The simulation results show that the minimum pore width for the adsorption of CO~2~ is 0.57 nm, the maximum adsorption occurs at pore width H = 2.43 nm and pressure P = 2.56β3.41 MPa, and capillary condensation takes place only for H>2 nm. It is also found that the wallβperpendicular orientation becomes preferential with the increase of pressure.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Capture of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel power plants via adsorption and sequestration of carbon dioxide in unmineable coal seams are achievable nearβterm methods of reducing atmospheric emissions of this greenhouse gas. To investigate the influence of surface heterogeneity upon predi
## Adsorption isotherms of N, by slit-shaped graphitic micropores at 77 K were simulated using grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation and compared the simulated isotherms with experimental adsorption isotherms of Nz on pitch-based activated carbon fibers. The pore was modeled as the slit sp
For four Kentucky coals, a comparison was made between pore volume distribution evaluated from CO2 adsorption isotherms calculated from the Cranston-lnkley method and the Medek method. These distributions agree in the micropore range from approximately 0.6-2.0 nm. Most of the pore structure is in th