โ Scribed by Reed M. Gardner; Olaf K. Golubjatnikov; R.Myron Laub; Julie T. Jacobson; R.Scott Evans
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
Recently the medical risk of blood transfusions has emphasized the need to improve the safe use of blood products. For the past 2 1/2 years at LDS Hospital we have used the HELP computer system to assist and critique ordering of blood products "on-line" by physicians and nurses. This report details the computer methods used to order blood products and to critique the appropriateness of those orders. Physicians personally enter the orders for more than 45% of the blood products using computer terminals, whereas 7% are from physician standing orders. Nurses enter the remaining orders from written orders (26%), verbal orders (14%), and phone orders (8%). There were 3396 blood orders for 1043 patients generated by 273 physicians during the fourth quarter of 1989. Each order is justified at the time it is entered by selecting from a menu of physician-approved criteria. The criteria are linked to supportive data in the data base, i.e., laboratory results and clinical data. The computer verified that 82% of these orders met criteria. Quality Assurance nurses verified the remaining 18%. Of these 18% only one in eight required manual chart review. After computer and Quality Assurance review, only eight (0.24%) of the orders were found to be true exceptions to established criteria. Physicians and nurses have accepted the computerized critiquing system. Through use of the computer we provide "on-line" critiquing and improve the use of scarce blood product resources.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## PATIENT ADVICE SYSTEM 475 ventilatory support of five patients for a total of 624 hr. During that time there were 407 decision-making opportunities. COMPAS automatically generated therapy suggestions 379 (93.1%) times and the clinical staff accepted COMPAS's recommendation in 320 (84.4%) of the