## Abstract An improved anisotropic model for the dissipation rate—ε—of the turbulent kinetic energy (__k__), to be used together with a non‐linear pressure‐strain correlations model, is proposed. Experimental data from the open literature for two confined turbulent swirling flows are used to asses
Computations of strongly swirling flows with second-moment closures
✍ Scribed by J.C. Chen; C.A. Lin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 241 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0271-2091
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The present study is concerned with simulating turbulent, strongly swirling flows by eddy viscosity model and Reynolds stress transport model variants adopting linear and quadratic form of the pressure -strain models. Flows with different inlet swirl numbers, 2.25 and 0.85, were investigated. Detailed comparisons of the predicted results and measurements were presented to assess the merits of model variants. For the swirl number 2.25 case, due to the inherent capability of the Reynolds stress models to capture the strong swirl and turbulence interaction, both the linear and quadratic form of the pressure -strain models predict the flow adequately. In strong contrast, the k-model predicts an excessively diffusive flow fields. For the swirl number 0.85 case, both the k-and Reynolds stress model with linear pressure -strain process, show an excessive diffusive transport of the flow fields. The quadratic pressure -strain model, on the other hand, mimics the correct flow development with the recirculating region being correctly predicted.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract An investigation on the predictive performance of four cubic eddy‐viscosity turbulence models for two strongly swirling confined flows is presented. Comparisons of the prediction with the experiments show clearly the superiority of cubic models over the linear k–εmodel. The linear k–εmo