✦ LIBER ✦

Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors' Decisions?

✍ Scribed by Cheryl Boudreau; Mathew D. McCubbins

Book ID: 111282463
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 160 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 1740-1453
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01160.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Expert testimony in child sexual abuse c

Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: The effects of evidence, coherence and credentials on juror decision making

✍ Bianca Klettke; Arthur C. Graesser; Martine B. Powell 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB 👁 2 views

The effects of labelling, expert testimo

The effects of labelling, expert testimony, and information processing mode on juror decisions in SVP civil commitment trials

✍ Joel D. Lieberman; Daniel A. Krauss 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB

## Abstract Expert witnesses offering testimony in sexually violent predator civil commitment trials may use diagnostic labels that are either familiar (e.g. ‘psychopath’) or unfamiliar (e.g. ‘paraphilia’) to jurors. Using predictions based on cognitive experiential self‐theory, we explored the inf

Juror decision-making in a mock sexually

Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony

✍ Laura S. Guy; John F. Edens 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 150 KB 👁 3 views

## Abstract Despite widespread use of mental health testimony in cases where violence risk is at issue, relatively little is known about the impact of such information on juror decision‐making. This study addressed the effects of testimony based on three types of risk assessment instrument or metho