Competence, paternalism, and public policy for mentally retarded people
โ Scribed by John C. Moskop
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 785 KB
- Volume
- 4
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1573-1200
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This article examines two currently disputed issues regarding public policy for mentally retarded people. First, questions are raised about the legal tradition of viewing mental competence as an all-or-nothing attribute. It is argued that recently developed limited competence and limited guardianship laws can provide greater freedom for retarded people without sacrificing needed protection. Second, the question of who should act paternalistically for retarded people incapable of acting for themselves is examined. Rothman's claim that special formal advocates are the best representatives for retarded people is discussed and criticized. It is argued that parents, professionals and legal advocates should share decision-making authority on behalf of those who are incompetent.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Direct-care staff turnover has frequently been cited as a major problem in the management of both public and nonpublic residential facilities. This article reports on a follow-up study of over lo00 direct-care staff one year after an initial interview. Staff members were employees of facilities in a
People with a serious mental illness are severely disadvantaged in terms of housing, which is a right for all. They are at greatly increased risk of homelessness. The disability brought about by mental illness means that they need support to acquire suitable housing and ongoing support for many task