๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparisons, mental models, and the action effect in judgments of regret

โœ Scribed by Aidan Feeney; Simon J. Handley

Book ID
111513850
Publisher
Psychonomic Society Publications
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
127 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0090-502X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Understanding conjunction effects in pro
Understanding conjunction effects in probability judgments: the role of implicit mental models
โœ Tilmann Betsch; Klaus Fiedler ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 167 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Subjective probability judgments often violate a normative principle in that the conjunction of two events is judged to be more likely than the probability of either of the two events occurring separately. Most previous explanations of these conjunction eects have assumed that probability judgments

Scaling the quality of teammates' mental
Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons
โœ John E. Mathieu; Tonia S. Heffner; Gerald F. Goodwin; Janis A. Cannon-Bowers; Ed ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 158 KB

We tested the impact of teammates' team and task mental model sharedness on team processes and performance using 70 undergraduate teams that completed a series of missions on a PCbased flight simulator. Moreover, we considered how the quality of mental models might moderate such relationships. Team