๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software

โœ Scribed by Simon French; Dong-Ling Xu

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
455 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
1057-9214

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the functionality and interfaces of five MCDM software packages. We recognize that no single package is appropriate for all decision contexts and processes. Thus our emphasis is not so much to compare the functionality of the packages per se, but to consider their fit with different decision making processes. In doing so, we hope to provide potential users with guidance on selecting a package that is more compatible with their needs. Moreover, we reflect on the further functionality which we would believe should be developed and included in MCDM packages. Copyright ยฉ 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

A multi-criterion experimental compariso
A multi-criterion experimental comparison of three multi-attribute weight measurement methods
โœ Mingshen Wang; Jenshou Yang ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 106 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The research compared three major multi-attribute weight measurement methods using multiple criteria: theoretical validity, predictive performance, and perceived performance. Major findings include (1) all three methods are theoretically valid using the EAM (Equal Weight Averaging Model) as the stan