𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of visual evoked potentials to stationary and to moving patterns

✍ Scribed by P. G. H. Clarke

Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1973
Tongue
English
Weight
516 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0014-4819

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Visual evoked potentials to various chec
Visual evoked potentials to various check patterns
✍ J. RΓΆver; M. Bach πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1985 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 180 KB

A target screen stimulus takes into account the necessity of larger checkerboard patterns with rising eccentricity. The target pattern should be calculated to fit the retinocortical magnification factor. This proposition is based on the working hypothesis that for maximal visual evoked potential (VE

Comparison of preoperative 10-Hz visual
Comparison of preoperative 10-Hz visual evoked potentials to contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after cataract extraction
✍ Sheri A. Cavender; Robert R. Hobson; Gung-Mei Chao; George W. Weinstein; J. Vern πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 415 KB

Cataract patients whose surgical outcomes were in question were referred for testing by visual evoked potentials, elicited through closed eyelids by a luminance stimulus (flash) that appeared 10 times per second. Visual evoked potentials were rated as normal (predicted acuity of 20/50 or better) or

Comparison of automated perimetry and pa
Comparison of automated perimetry and pattern visually evoked cortical potentials in optic neuritis
✍ N. Fujimoto; E. Adachi-Usami πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› Springer-Verlag 🌐 English βš– 301 KB

Twenty-one eyes of thirteen patients suffering from optic neuritis were examined with the Octopus automated perimeter and pattern visually evoked cortical potentials. All eyes had visual acuity of 0.2 or better. Visual field examination was measured by program 31 or 33, which tests the central 30-de