𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow

✍ Scribed by Yi Sun; David O. Hearshen; Gary W. Rankin; Allan M. Haggar


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
957 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The contrast of flow‐encoded magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained in vivo and the accuracy of velocity measurements are complicated by the presence of complex flow states. The effects of complex flow states on MR flow‐encoded images were studied and quantitative flow information was obtained with an MR phase‐subtraction technique. Regions of complex flow, including flow stagnation and separation and laminar flow, could be clearly identified on the phase images. The MR imaging velocity measurements were validated by comparison with numerical simulation results for three‐dimensional velocity distributions. The velocity MR images and the profiles obtained from the simulation generally agreed well for flow rates of 660 and 1,680 mL/min. This agreement lends support to both the fluid dynamic model and the physical basis of the phase imaging technique and establishes the validity of flow‐encoded phase imaging as an in vivo flow quantization method, especially under low Reynolds number flow conditions.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Accelerated phase-contrast MR imaging: C
✍ Andreas Stadlbauer; Wilma van der Riet; Sebastian Globits; Gerard Crelier; Erich 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 457 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate differences in velocity and flow measurements in the aorta between accelerated phase‐contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using SENSE and k‐t BLAST and in peak velocity to Doppler ultrasound. ## Materials and Methods Two‐dimensional PC‐MRI perpendicul