## Abstract As the number of preferenceβbased instruments grows, it becomes increasingly important to compare different preferenceβbased measures of health in order to inform an important debate on the choice of instrument. This paper presents a comparison of two of them, the EQβ5D and the SFβ6D (r
β¦ LIBER β¦
Comparison of valuation methods used to generate the EQ-5D and the SF-6D value sets
β Scribed by Aki Tsuchiya; John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts
- Book ID
- 116649625
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 414 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0167-6296
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D acro
β
John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Aki Tsuchiya; Jan Busschbach
π
Article
π
2004
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 180 KB
PMH45 Comparison of the SF-6D and the EQ
β
A. Millier; E. Perthame; S. Aballea; M. Toumi
π
Article
π
2011
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 59 KB
Predicting EQ-5D-US and SF-6D societal h
β
C. M. McDonough; M. R. Grove; A. D. Elledge; A. N. A. Tosteson
π
Article
π
2011
π
Springer-Verlag
π
English
β 246 KB
Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D Descri
β
Murtuza Bharmal; Joseph Thomas III
π
Article
π
2006
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 86 KB
Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an
β
J. A Johnson; S. J Coons
π
Article
π
1998
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 210 KB
A comparison of the performance of the E
β
Garry R. Barton; Tracey H. Sach; Anthony J. Avery; Claire Jenkinson; Michael Doh
π
Article
π
2008
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 215 KB
## Abstract We sought to compare the performance of the EQβ5D and SFβ6D with regard to the criteria of practicality, convergent validity, and construct validity, the level of agreement between the two measures was also assessed. Responses from 1865 individuals aged β₯ 45 years in one general practic