Comparison of Two Methods of Zooplankton Grazing Measurements
✍ Scribed by Tiina Nőges
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 446 KB
- Volume
- 77
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1434-2944
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A comparison of two methods of zooplankton feeding experiments was performed in the Gulf of Finland. One was the advanced twin-bathometer method (in sitii technique), the otherthe "bottle method". The main difference between the two methods is that it is not necessary to manipulate zooplankton to start an experiment in a twin bathometer, while manipulation is inevitable if the second method is used. In cases when the onset of the grazing experiment requires the manipulation of animals, the adaptation period lasts 2-4 hours and the optimal duration of experiment is 6-10 hours. If animals are not manipulated at the beginning of experiment, the adaptation period does not exist, the exposition time should not exceed 10 hours and the optimal duration of experiment is 2-4 hours. In long-term experiments (up to 24 hours) the fertilization effect of the excretion of concentrated zooplankton may cause underestimation of grazing rate.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Dentin permeability was measured alternatively with two methods: a 10-microl capillary method with visual evaluation (PC) and a motorized automatic measuring device (Flodec, FD), both interposed in a simulated perfusion system. Eight human third molar coronal fragments were connected to systems, and
A coniparison between a large plankt,on trap with a capacity of 33 litres and a modern towecl net was made in the course of zooplankton production studies in the Balt,ic. On the average, the net efficiency was 75 U#, of that, of the trap. Both methods were equally efficient in catching naapliar stag