๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparison of Two Methods of Finite Element Modeling for Elbows with Unequal Wall Thickness

โœ Scribed by Junhua Dong; Xiangfu Bao; Xize Zheng

Book ID
116833595
Publisher
Elsevier
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
414 KB
Volume
33
Category
Article
ISSN
1875-3892

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

DIRECT FORMULATION FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
DIRECT FORMULATION FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL GROUNDWATER POLLUTION MODELLING WITH A COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
โœ M. GHULAM RABBANI ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 804 KB

Real world ground water pollution modelling deals with solute transport through anisotropic, heterogeneous media. The applicability of analytical solutions for such a real world system is extremely limited. As an effective tool, numerical models, such as finite difference and finite element methods,

A Comparison of Two Numerical Methods fo
A Comparison of Two Numerical Methods for Integrating a Quasi-geostrophic Multilayer Model of Ocean Circulations: Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods
โœ Christian LeProvost; Christine Bernier; Eric Blayo ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 845 KB

To study the feasibility of using the finite elements method for ocean modelling, a quasi-geostrophic eddy resolving general circulation model has been driven, using either a classical finite differences technique or a finite elements technique. This feasibility has been clearly demonstrated, and a