✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation

✍ Scribed by Altiok, E.; Koos, R.; Schroder, J.; Brehmer, K.; Hamada, S.; Becker, M.; Mahnken, A. H.; Almalla, M.; Dohmen, G.; Autschbach, R.; Marx, N.; Hoffmann, R.

Book ID: 118137605
Publisher: BMJ
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 396 KB
Volume: 97
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-0769
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2011.223974

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of echocardiography and CT an

Comparison of echocardiography and CT angiography for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation

✍ Nada Alshayeb; Ahmed Alsaileek; Ahmad Omran 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

Measurement of Aortic Valve Annulus Usin

Measurement of Aortic Valve Annulus Using Different Cardiac Imaging Techniques in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Agreement with Finally Implanted Prosthesis Size

✍ Dolores Mesa Rubio; José Suárez de Lezo Cruz Conde; Manuel Pan Alvarez-Osorio; M 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 443 KB

Comparison of aortic root measurements i

Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability

✍ Lukas H. J. Lehmkuhl, Konstantin von Aspern, Borek Foldyna, Matthias Grothoff, S 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 454 KB

Measuring aortic diameter with different

Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: Comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP

✍ Silke Potthast; Lee Mitsumori; Luana A. Stanescu; Michael L. Richardson; Kelley 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 373 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Purpose: To compare nongated three‐dimensional (3D) contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE‐MRA) with 3D‐navigated cardiac‐gated steady‐state free‐precession bright blood (3D‐nav SSFP) and noncontrast 2D techniques for ascending aorta dimension measurements. ## Materia