A comparison of immunofluorescence (IF), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and isolation in tissue culture (TC) for detection of respiratory viruses was performed on 496 nasopharyngeal aspirates from children under 5 years of age with lower acute respiratory infections who were receiving attention at three hospitals in Buenos Aires, Argentina. All samples were tested by the three methods for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza A and B, adenovirus, and parainfluenza 1 and 3. Viral diagnosis was made in 167 samples (33.7%); of these, 124 (74.3%) were isolated in TC, whereas 120 (71.8%) were detected by ELISA and 127 (76%) by IF. RSV was detected in 121 samples, mainly by ELISA and IF. The sensitivity and specificity of each rapid technique as compared with isolation in TC were similar, reaching 98% and 92%, respectively. When ELISA was compared with IF, the sensitivity was 95%, and the specificity was 98%. Adenovirus was detected in 18 patients by TC. For this virus, rapid techniques sensitivity as compared with TC was low (almost 22%). Parainfluenza 3 was readily detected by IF and TC; influenza A, B and parainfluenza 1 were detected in few samples; and tissue culture proved more efficient than rapid techniques. The results indicate that both rapid techniques are good tools for the detection of most respiratory viruses except for adenovirus, for which TC cannot be omitted.