Comparison of the performances of decision aimed algorithms with Bayesian and beliefs basis
✍ Scribed by François Delmotte
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 158 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0884-8173
- DOI
- 10.1002/int.1044
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
There are strong views in the literature between the advocates of the Bayesian approach on one hand and the advocates of the belief functions on the other. This paper refers to a few previously published studies showing that, for decision-aimed problems, algorithms using belief functions were much slower than those using a Bayesian approach. Thus, if beliefs are appealing intellectually, they are in fact useless for real applications. This article shows that most of these studies are simply false, because they are based on an erroneous use of the belief functions.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
by employing FGs instead of SCFP filters the performance of directly detected OFDM systems can be significantly improved, which enables a higher OFDM network capacity for a fixed BER. 6.
This project compared the effect of formulation variables on the dissolution performance of model Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class II drugs from hard gelatin capsules using statistical analysis and Bayesian networks. The drugs chosen for this study were carbamazepine (CAR), chlorpr
## Abstract The aim of this work is to compare the performances of two well‐known methods, Minimum Principle and Genetic Algorithm, in the optimization of the methyl methacrylate polymerization process in solution. In order to select a kinetic model for this process, the published kinetic models we