✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison of surrogate surface techniques for estimation of sulfate dry deposition

✍ Scribed by John J. Vandenberg; Kenneth R. Knoerr

Book ID: 113122383
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1985
Tongue: English
Weight: 1006 KB
Volume: 19
Category: Article
ISSN: 0004-6981
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(85)90042-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Dry deposition of sulfate onto surrogate

Dry deposition of sulfate onto surrogate surfaces

✍ Davidson, Cliff I.; Lindberg, Steven E.; Schmidt, Jill A.; Cartwright, Lawrence 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 850 KB

Use of surrogate surfaces for dry deposi

Use of surrogate surfaces for dry deposition measurements

✍ Y. Vawda; R.M. Harrison; K.W. Nicholson; I. Colbeck 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 247 KB

Dry deposition of large, airborne partic

Dry deposition of large, airborne particles onto a surrogate surface

✍ Eugene Kim; David Kalman; Timothy Larson 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 381 KB

Dry deposition of nitrate and sulphate o

Dry deposition of nitrate and sulphate on surrogate surfaces

✍ A. Saxena; U.C. Kulshreshta; N. Kumar; K.M. Kumari; S.S. Srivastava 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 378 KB

Comparison of dry and wet surfaces for c

Comparison of dry and wet surfaces for collecting organochlorine dry deposition

✍ E. J. Christensen; C. E. Olney; T. F. Bidleman 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 253 KB

Improved estimates of sulfate dry deposi

Improved estimates of sulfate dry deposition in Eastern North America

✍ Wesely, Marvin L. ;Shannon, Jack D. 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 528 KB

locations on the basin. Apparently GC chemical separation and air leaks were minimal for this sortie also. Considering all observations, the average flux was 3.4 ng/cmz \* s with standard deviation of 1.7 ng/cm' \* s.Conditions were not as ideal on the second trip to this site, where the average flu