## Abstract ## Purpose We investigated the feasibility of using realβtime sonography to measure muscle thickness. Clinically, this technique would be used to measure the thickness of human muscles in which intramuscular microstimulators have been implanted to treat or prevent disuse atrophy. ## M
Comparison of sonography and MRI for diagnosing epicondylitis
β Scribed by Theodore T. Miller; Micheal A. Shapiro; Elizabeth Schultz; Paul E. Kalish
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 299 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0091-2751
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this prospective study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of sonography with those of MRI in evaluating epicondylitis.
Methods
The affected elbows of 11 patients with suspected epicondylitis were examined sonographically, and the contralateral (normal) elbow was also examined for comparison. In 10 of these patients, the affected elbow was also examined with MRI. In addition, both elbows of 6 volunteers without epicondylitis were examined sonographically; 1 elbow of each volunteer was designated as the ``test'' elbow and was examined with MRI. The sonograms of the patients' affected elbows and the volunteers' test elbows were paired with the sonograms of the contralateral elbows for comparison and were randomly shown twice to 2 readers. These readers, working independently and without knowledge of the findings of MRI, were instructed to state whether each elbow was normal or affected by epicondylitis. The MRI scans were then shown to the readers for similar review.
Results
Sonographic features of epicondylitis included outward bowing of the common tendon, presence of hypoechoic fluid subadjacent to the common tendon, thickening, decreased echogenicity, and illβdefined margins of the common tendon. Sensitivity for detecting epicondylitis ranged from 64% to 82% for sonography and from 90% to 100% for MRI. Specificity ranged from 67% to 100% for sonography and from 83% to 100% for MRI.
Conclusions
Sonography is as specific but not as sensitive as MRI for evaluating epicondylitis. Used as an initial imaging tool, sonography might be adequate for diagnosing this condition in many patients, thus allowing MRI to be reserved for patients with symptoms whose sonographic findings are normal. Β© 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 30:193β202, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jcu.10063
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose The goal of this study was to compare the sensitivity of sonography with that of mammography in the detection of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), to identify ILC's typical imaging characteristics, and to further show the important role of ultrasound in the staging and treat
## Abstract ## Purpose: The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to evaluate the effect of three preparation types on the abdominal sonographic examination quality and on patient acceptance. ## Methods: Examinations were performed on 611 patients in the imaging department of a refer
Sonographic and computed tomography findings were retrospectively compared in 13 patients with proven abdominal tuberculosis who had both diagnostic modalities in their workup. The patients were treated over 9 years in two general hospitals in Kuwait. Ultrasound could detect the same findings as CT
## Abstract ## Purpose. To determine the diagnostic accuracy values of sonography in the detection of renal stones using noncontrast CT as the gold standard. In addition, we correlated the accuracy of sonography with stone size, the kidney affected (right versus left), and body mass index (BMI).