Comparison of semiempirical calculations for silicon compounds
β Scribed by W. S. Verwoerd; K. Weimer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 359 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0192-8651
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
A comparison is made of the performance of the MIND0/3, MNDO, AM1, and PM3 methods in calculating the nature of the dimer reconstruction observed on the silicon (100) crystal surface. Based on this case study we conclude that MIND013 gives the most realistic results, with PM3 calculations being quite similar but both MNDO and AM1 missing some key features of this system and giving rather unrealistic charge distributions. Hence use of PM3 is recommended for Si containing molecules where a lack of parameters or other restrictions prevent the use of MINDO/3.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Proton affinities (PAS) of a series of phosphorous compounds bearing the phosphoryl function have been calculated using AM1 and PM3, as well as lithium-cation affinities (LCAs) using the recent PM3 lithium parametrization. Sulfonyl derivatives PAS and LCAs have been also calculated using PM3. The Li
Various nitrogen clusters, N,, are selected for the present theoretical study. The number of nitrogen atoms chosen in this work varies from x = 8 to x = 32. PM3, which is known as one of the best semiempirical methods, is selected for the self-consistent molecular orbital calculations. The geometric
The potential energy surfaces of four cyclic alkanes have been examined using molecular mechanics, semiempirical, and ab initio methods to determine if they produce mutually consistent results and investigate the source of any errors between the methods. The C5 -CR cyclic alkanes were chosen since t
The use of AM1, MNDO, and MNDOC semiempirical MO methods for calculation of heats of formation and ionization potentials of a series of 38 radicals are described. AM1 and MNDO calculations are reported using both half-electron (HE) and Unrestricted Hartree Fock (UHF) wavefunctions. Results show the