We apply a battery of modern, adaptive non-linear learning methods to a large real database of cardiac patient data. We use each method to predict 30 day mortality from a large number of potential risk factors, and we compare their performances. We find that none of the methods could outperform a re
β¦ LIBER β¦
Comparison of rough-set and statistical methods in inductive learning
β Scribed by S.K.M. Wong; Wojciech Ziarko; R.Li Ye
- Book ID
- 108332430
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1986
- Weight
- 830 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7373
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A comparison of statistical learning met
β
Marguerite Ennis; Geoffrey Hinton; David Naylor; Mike Revow; Robert Tibshirani
π
Article
π
1998
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 101 KB
π 2 views
Comparison of two multicriteria decision
β
J. Renaud; J. Thibault; R. Lanouette; L.N. Kiss; K. Zaras; C. Fonteix
π
Article
π
2007
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 876 KB
Comparison of statistical methods in MR
β
Fred Godtliebsen; Emil SpjsΓΈtvoll
π
Article
π
1991
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 671 KB
## Abstract The problem of recovering the true underlying scene from a noisy image is considered. Several methods are compared empirically by applying them to magnetic resonance (MR) images. It turns out that a simple method, the Gaussian window filter, gives good results. This method requires only
A Comparison of the Rough Sets and Recur
β
Mickael Daubie; Philippe Levecq; Nadine Meskens
π
Article
π
2002
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 136 KB
A comparison of fuzzy set theory and rou
β
Tadeusz Radecki
π
Article
π
1988
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 116 KB
Stimulus set size and statistical covera
β
Fenna H. Poletiek; Tessa J. P. van Schijndel
π
Article
π
2009
π
Springer-Verlag
π
English
β 163 KB