๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparison of ROESY and EXSY Methods Using Bloch Equations

โœ Scribed by Rajesh Shukla


Book ID
102652596
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
671 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0749-1581

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A comparison of longitudinal and transverse frame magnetization transfer methods is provided using modified Bloch equations for a two-spin system representative of a methylene group exchanging between two chemically distinct sites. This simple formalism incorporates chemical shift, auto-and cross-relaxation terms, chemical exchange first-order rate constants and r.f. field terms for ROESY experiments. Overhauser and exchange magnetization transfer is emulated at three limits of molecular reorientation time (tJ The calculated build up curves suggest a parasitic effect of ROE on chemical exchange magnetization transfer. In addition, for molecules harboring spin systems exchanging between sites such that the exchange rate approximates the transverse cross-relaxation rate, and reorienting in solution at rates slower than that defined by the CAMELSPIN limit (oat, M 1.118), the calculations suggest observation of exchange or Overhauser cross peaks may be compromised. Finally, the effect of off-resonance spin locking r.f. power level is explored upon exchange or Overhauser build-up curve profiles. The results suggest off-resonance approaches that at low r.f. spin locking power may adversely affect ROE or exchange build-up rates and may compromise either exchange rate determination or internuclear distance estimation.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


COMPARISON OF SENSITIVITY EQUATION AND A
โœ AKIRA ANJU; MUTSUTO KAWAHARA ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 127 KB

This paper deals with the inverse analysis of a thermal conduction problem, in which the thermal conductivity is identiรฟed as an unknown parameter, which is determined so as to minimize the cost function represented by the square of the di erence between the computed and observed temperatures at pre