Steady-state free precession imaging is a promising technique for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as it provides improved blood/myocardial contrast in shorter acquisition times compared with conventional gradient-echo acquisition. The better contrast could improve observer agreement and au
Comparison of right ventricular volume measurement between segmented k-space gradient-echo and steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging
✍ Scribed by Khaled Alfakih; Holger Thiele; Sven Plein; Gavin J. Bainbridge; John P. Ridgway; Mohan U. Sivananthan
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 460 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To compare right ventricular volume measurements and their reproducibility between steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and conventional turbo gradient‐echo (TGE) imaging.
Materials and Methods
Right ventricular volumes and observer variabilities were compared between SSFP and TGE in 31 subjects (21 normal volunteers and 10 subjects with heart failure). For further internal validation of the right ventricular volumes, the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) stroke volumes were compared for the normal volunteers.
Results
The volumes as measured by SSFP were significantly larger than for TGE (mean bias end‐diastolic volume [EDV] 11.1 ± 14.2, end‐systolic volume [ESV] 9.8 ± 9.75). SSFP had lower interobserver variability (SSFP EDV −10.1 ± 11.6 vs. TGE EDV −6.2 ± 18.5) and intra‐observer variability (SSFP EDV −2.0 ± 6.3 vs. TGE EDV −6.1 ± 14.8). The mean absolute differences between LV and RV stroke volumes for 21 normal volunteers were: TGE 5.8 ± 12.9 (r^2^ = 0.72), SSFP 4.6 ± 6.9 (r^2^ = 0.92).
Conclusion
SSFP and TGE yield different measurement values of RV volumes with SSFP, providing a more reproducible measurement. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;16:253–258. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES