Comparison of reconstructive procedures in primary versus secondary mandibular reconstruction
β Scribed by William N. Andrade; Joan E. Lipa; Christine B. Novak; Harpreet Grover; Christian Bang; Ralph W. Gilbert; Peter C. Neligan
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 79 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background.
Few reports have compared reconstructive outcomes of primary versus secondary mandibular reconstruction.
Methods.
A retrospective chart review was performed on 149 patients following primary (n = 110) and secondary reconstruction (n = 39).
Results.
There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographics between the 2 groups. The secondary reconstruction mandibular defects were more extensive; significantly more involved the condyle or the central portion of the mandible. The vascularized fibular flap was most commonly used (primary 82%, secondary 69%). The overall complication rate was similar in both groups. There was no statistical difference in the frequency of complications between the primary or secondary reconstruction groups (acute, p = .40; late, p = .17).
Conclusions.
Success in secondary mandibular reconstruction could be achieved utilizing a range of osseous free flaps, and there was no increased rate of complications compared with primary mandibular reconstructions. Β© 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2008
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Background. Functional restoration following resection or traumatic injury to the mandible depends on the reliability of the bony reconstruction to heal primarily and support endosseous implants. Although vascularized bone flaps (VBF) and nonvascularized bone grafts (NVBG) are both widely used to re
## Abstract ## Background. Autologous vein grafts are a valuable tool in microsurgical free tissue transfer. Interposition vein grafts offer the surgeon greater freedom when placing the free flap and choosing the recipient vessels, providing valuable options in case recipient vessels are not avail
## Abstract Objective: To evaluate if there are differences in procedural times, success rates, and safety between left and right radial approach (LRA and RRA, respectively) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STβelevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background: Given conflic