๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparison of pullout strength of small-diameter cannulated and solid-core screws

โœ Scribed by Charles G Kissel; Scott C Friedersdorf; Douglas S Foltz; Todd Snoeyink


Book ID
114471155
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
134 KB
Volume
42
Category
Article
ISSN
1067-2516

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of pullout strength of resorb
โœ Andrea F. Lewis; J. Randall Jordan; Doug E. Parsell; Mark Kosko ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 110 KB

## Abstract ## Background. In a previous study at our institution, it was determined that resorbable screws with untapped drill holes resulted in the highest resistance forces to linear load when compared with titanium screws. The 1.1โ€mm drill diameter/2.0โ€mm screw diameter and 1.5/2.0 drill/screw

Increase of pullout strength of spinal p
โœ Ching-Chi Hsu; Ching-Kong Chao; Jaw-Lin Wang; Sheng-Mou Hou; Ying-Tsung Tsai; Ji ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 790 KB

## Abstract Screw loosening can threaten pedicle screw fixation of the spine. Conical screws can improve the bending strength, but studies of their pullout strength as compared with that of cylindrical screws have shown wide variation. In the present study, polyurethane foam with two different dens