✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction

✍ Scribed by C.P. Etler; P.J. Abbas; M.L. Hughes; C.J. Brown; S.M. Dunn; L.J. Zubrod; T.L. Van Voorst

Book ID: 116537235
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Weight: 244 KB
Volume: 1273
Category: Article
ISSN: 0531-5131
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.09.016

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Electrophysiological and Psychophysical

Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures of Interocular Suppression

✍ James G. May; M. Russell Harter; John B. Siegfried 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 461 KB

PSYCHOPHYSICAL MEASURES OF TEXTURE

✍ HOWARD R. MOSKOWITZ; BIRGER DRAKE; CAJ ÅKESSON 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 742 KB

Human scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivit

Human scotopic spatiotemporal sensitivity: a comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological data

✍ György Benedek; Krisztina Benedek; Szabolcs Kéri; Tamás Letoha; Márta Janáky 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 255 KB

Comparison of sensitivity of psychophysi

Comparison of sensitivity of psychophysical and electrophysiological measures of scotopic thresholds in the vicinity of the blind spot

✍ Payne, W. H. 📂 Article 📅 1967 🏛 Psychonomic Society Publications 🌐 English ⚖ 412 KB

Electrophysiology and psychophysics of a

Electrophysiology and psychophysics of a case of amblyopia

✍ H. Spekreijse; L.H. Van Der Tweel; Miss L. Khoe 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB

Dynamic stereoacuity: A comparison of el

Dynamic stereoacuity: A comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical responses in normal and stereoblind observers

✍ Gung-Mei Chao; J. Vernon Odom; Daniel Karr 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 662 KB

We compared stereoscopic thresholds determined psychophysically and by using visually evoked potentials in normal adult and stereoblind subjects. For normal observers there was a strong linear relationship between visual evoked potential amplitude and disparity (r = 0.86 on average). However, stereo