๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparison of neurotrophin and repellent sensitivities of early embryonic geniculate and trigeminal axons

โœ Scribed by M. William Rochlin; Robert O'Connor; Roman J. Giger; Joost Verhaagen; Albert I. Farbman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
949 KB
Volume
422
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9967

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Geniculate (gustatory) and trigeminal (somatosensory) afferents take different routes to the tongue during rat embryonic development. To learn more about the mechanisms controlling neurite outgrowth and axon guidance, we are studying the roles of diffusible factors. We previously profiled the in vitro sensitivity of trigeminal axons to neurotrophins and targetderived diffusible factors and now report on these properties for geniculate axons. GDNF, BDNF, and NT-4, but not NT-3 or NGF, stimulate geniculate axon outgrowth during the ages investigated, embryonic days 12-14. Sensitivity to effective neurotrophins is developmentally regulated and different from that of the trigeminal ganglion. In vitro coculture studies revealed that geniculate axons were repelled by branchial arch explants that were previously shown to be repellent to trigeminal axons (Rochlin and Farbman [1998] J Neurosci 18:6840 -6852). In addition, some branchial arch explants and untransfected COS7 cells repelled geniculate but not trigeminal axons. Sema3A, a ligand for neuropilin-1, is effective in repelling geniculate and trigeminal axons, and antineuropilin-1, but not antineuropilin-2, completely blocks the repulsion by arch explants that repel axon outgrowth from both ganglia. Sema3A mRNA is concentrated in branchial arch epithelium at the appropriate time to mediate the repulsion. In Sema3A knockout mice, geniculate and trigeminal afferents explore medial regions of the immature tongue and surrounding territories not explored in heterozygotes, supporting our previous hypothesis that Sema3A-based repulsion mediates the early restriction of sensory afferents away from midline structures.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of cholinergic and histaminer
โœ Wilson, James R. ;Manning, Karen A. ;Forestner, Donna M. ;Counts, Scott E. ;Uhlr ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 788 KB

The cholinergic and histaminergic projections have important neuromodulatory functions in the ascending visual pathways, so we compared the pattern and mode of innervation of the two projections in the lateral geniculate complex (dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus and pregeniculate nucleus) of the ma