๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparison of navigation accuracy in THA between the mini-anterior and -posterior approaches

โœ Scribed by Takehito Hananouchi; Masaki Takao; Takashi Nishii; Hidenobu Miki; Daiki Iwana; Hideki Yoshikawa; Nobuhiko Sugano


Book ID
104583240
Publisher
Wiley (Robotic Publications)
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
185 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
1478-5951

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

The accuracy of a CTโ€based hip navigation might depend on surgical approaches, resulting in varying accuracy of implant alignment.

Methods

We performed primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) with miniโ€incision surgery (MIS) to 40 wellโ€matched patients (anterior or posterior approaches, 20 hips each), using navigation with surface registration. We investigated cup alignment using postoperative computed tomography (CT) and compared the navigation accuracy between the two approaches, i.e. the difference between intraโ€operative and postoperative alignments of the cup.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two approaches. The mean navigation accuracies in abduction and anteversion were 2.0ยฐ (SD 1.4ยฐ ) and 2.7ยฐ (SD 1.9ยฐ ), respectively, in the anterior approach, and 2.4ยฐ (SD 2.0ยฐ ) and 2.0ยฐ (SD 1.4ยฐ ), respectively, in the posterior approach. All cup alignments were within 10ยฐ of the target orientation.

Conclusions

This CTโ€based navigation for MISโ€“THA provides navigation accuracy without significant differences between the two approaches and with favourable alignment of the cup. Copyright ยฉ 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES