Comparison of methods for obtaining longitudinal whole-brain magnetization transfer measurements

✍ Scribed by John L. Ostuni; Nancy Richert; Ruth Wisniewski; Bobbi K. Lewis; Thomas Howard; Jay Patel; Joseph A. Frank

• Book ID: 102904633
• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2002
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 904 KB
• Volume: 15
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1053-1807
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10040

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether the method of applying image masks can alter quantifiable measures determined from whole‐brain MTR calculations.

Materials and Methods

Thirty‐five T1/MT image pairs were obtained from five normal volunteers. For each pair a mask was used to specify the regions to be analyzed. Using these regions, a histogram was used to calculate seven global MTR metrics. This process was performed three ways: 1) using a unique mask for each T1/MT pair, 2) sharing a single mask for each subject and registering all intrasubject images to the image corresponding to their mask, and 3) sharing a single mask for each subject and transforming that mask into alignment with each of their original T1/MT image pairs.

Results

With respect to the first method, the latter two methods caused small but significant differences in several parameters.

Conclusion

The method of applying image masks can affect whole‐brain MTR values. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;15:8–15. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.