Comparison of methods for detecting nondeterministic BOLD fluctuation in fMRI

✍ Scribed by Vesa. Kiviniemi; Juha-Heikki. Kantola; Jukka. Jauhiainen; Osmo. Tervonen

• Publisher: Elsevier Science
• Year: 2004
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 269 KB
• Volume: 22
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0730-725X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.09.007

✦ Synopsis

Functional MR imaging (fMRI) has been used in detecting neuronal activation and intrinsic blood flow fluctuations in the brain cortex. This article is aimed for comparing the methods for analyzing the nondeterministic flow fluctuations. Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT), cross correlation (CC), spatial principal component analysis (sPCA), and independent component analysis (sICA) were compared. 15 subjects were imaged at 1.5 T. Three quantitative measures were compared: (1) The number of subjects with identifiable fluctuation, (2) the volume, and (3) mean correlation coefficient (MCC) of the detected voxels. The focusing on cortical structures and the overall usability were qualitatively assessed. sICA was spatially most accurate but time consuming, robust, and detected voxels with high temporal synchrony. The CC and FFT were fast suiting primary screening. The CC detected highest temporal synchrony but the subjective detection for reference vector produced excess variance of the detected volumes. The FFT and sPCA were not spatially accurate and did not detect adequate temporal synchrony of the voxels.