Comparison of manual and automated nucleic acid extraction from whole-blood samples

✍ Scribed by Kathrin Riemann; Michael Adamzik; Stefan Frauenrath; Rupert Egensperger; Kurt W. Schmid; Norbert H. Brockmeyer; Winfried Siffert

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2007
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 185 KB
• Volume: 21
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0887-8013
• DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20174

✦ Synopsis

Nucleic acid extraction and purification from whole blood is a routine application in many laboratories. Automation of this procedure promises standardized sample treatment, a low error rate, and avoidance of contamination. The performance of the BioRobot M48 (Qiagen) and the manual QIAmp s DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen) was compared for the extraction of DNA from whole blood. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNAs were determined by spectrophotometry. Analytical sensitivity was assessed by common PCR and genotyping techniques. The quantity and quality of the generated DNAs were slightly higher using the manual extraction method. The results of downstream applications were comparable to each other. Amplification of high-molecular-weight PCR fragments, genotyping by restriction digest, and pyrosequencing were successful for all samples. No cross-contamination could be detected. While automated DNA extraction requires significantly less hands-on time, it is slightly more expensive than the manual extraction method.