Comparison of LaBr3:Ce and NAI(Tl) scintillators for radio-isotope identification devices
β Scribed by B.D. Milbrath; B.J. Choate; J.E. Fast; W.K. Hensley; R.T. Kouzes; J.E. Schweppe
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 279 KB
- Volume
- 572
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0168-9002
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Lanthanum bromide (LaBr 3 :Ce) scintillators offer significantly better resolution (o3 percent at 662 keV) relative to sodium iodide (NaI(Tl)) but contain internal radioactivity that contributes to spectral counts. LaBr 3 :Ce has recently become available commercially in sizes large enough for the hand-held radio-isotope identification device (RIID) market. To study its potential for RIIDs, a series of measurements were performed comparing a 1.5 Γ 1.5-in. LaBr 3 :Ce detector with an Exploranium GR-135 RIID, which contains a 1.5 Γ 2.2-in. NaI(Tl) detector. Measurements were taken for short time frames and included examples of naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), typically found in cargo, and special nuclear materials. To facilitate direct comparison, spectra from the different detectors were analyzed with the same isotope identification software (ORTEC ScintiVision TM ). In general, the LaBr 3 :Ce detector was able to find more peaks and find them faster than the NaI(Tl) detector. To the same level of significance, the LaBr 3 :Ce detector was usually two to three times faster. The notable exception was for 40 K-containing NORM where interfering internal activity due to 138 La in the LaBr 3 :Ce detector exists and NaI(Tl) consistently outperformed LaBr 3 :Ce.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The demand for radiation portal monitor (RPM) systems has increased, and their capabilities are being further scrutinized as they are being applied to the task of detecting nuclear weapons, special nuclear material, and radiation dispersal device materials that could appear at borders. The requireme