𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of human papillomavirus in situ hybridization and p16 immunohistochemistry in the detection of human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancer based on a prospective clinical experience

✍ Scribed by Aatur D. Singhi; William H. Westra


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
575 KB
Volume
116
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a causative agent in a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). These HPV‐related cancers have a clinicopathologic profile that diverges from HPV‐negative HNSCCs. Accordingly, HPV testing may soon become integrated into standard pathologic assessment of HNSCCs.

METHODS:

Data were prospectively collected for all patients with head and neck carcinomas who had undergone HPV testing at the Johns Hopkins Hospital as part of clinical care during a 57‐month period. HPV testing consisted of concurrent HPV16 in situ hybridization (ISH) and p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Wide spectrum HPV ISH was reserved for p16‐positive cases that were HPV‐16 negative.

RESULTS:

HPV analysis was performed on 256 head and neck carcinomas in an effort to predict clinical outcomes (56%), localize primary tumor origin (21%), establish tumor classification (9%), determine patient eligibility for vaccine trials (8%), or satisfy patient curiosity (5%). A total of 182 (71%) tumors were HPV positive. HPV positivity correlated with oropharyngeal site (82% vs 9%) and male sex (77% vs 48%). p16 positivity was present in all 176 HPV16‐positive cases, and in 19 of 80 (24%) cases that were HPV‐16 negative. In 6 (32%) discordant cases, p16 expression was because of the presence of another HPV type.

CONCLUSIONS

A feasible strategy that incorporates p16 IHC and HPV ISH is able to detect HPV in a high percentage of oropharyngeal carcinomas. HPV status is frequently requested by the oncologist to estimate clinical outcome, and used by pathologists to establish tumor classification and determine site of tumor origin. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of hybrid capture 2 with in s
✍ Hesselink, Albertus T. ;van den Brule, Adriaan J. C. ;Brink, Antoinette A. T. P. 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 426 KB 👁 2 views

The authors thank Prof. C. J. L. M. Meijer for his continuous support. They are grateful to Mr. B. Bakker, Mrs. T. Tadema, Mrs. N. Fransen Daalmeijer, and Mrs. P. van Diemen for excellent technical assistance. Coated slides for liquid-based cytology were kindly provided by Ventana Medical Systems. S

Association of p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymo
✍ Xuemei Ji; Erich M. Sturgis; Chong Zhao; Carol J. Etzel; Qingyi Wei; Guojun Li 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: The tumor protein p73 interacts with the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV‐16) oncoproteins E6 and E7, and __p73__ variation may modify the interaction between p73 protein and HPV‐16 oncogenic proteins and contribute to cellular malignant transformation. ## METHODS: In