Comparison of echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology for the imaging evaluation of intracardiac masess
✍ Scribed by Juan M Bonelli; Eric Kimura; Gabriela Meléndez; Francisco Castillo; Sergio G Olmos; Nelsy C González; Erick Alexánderson; Luis Marroquin; Fernando Iñarra; José E Telich-Tarriba; Aloha Meave
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 74 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1097-6647
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively the diagnostic yield of anal endosonography (AES) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of perianal fistulae and abscesses. There were 39 patients (14 men, 25 women; mean age, 40 years) who underwent AES, performed with a 10-MHz
Electromyography (EMG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used in the diagnosis of cervical and lumbosacral radiculopathy, but the agreement between the two studies is unknown. We retrospectively studied 47 patients with a clinical history compatible with either cervical or lumbosacra