𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparison of digital subtraction arteriography and conventional film screen subtraction arteriography for neuroradiology

✍ Scribed by R. A. Zimmerman; R. I. Grossman; H. I. Goldberg; Roberta Lynch; R. Levine; L. Samuel

Book ID
104731272
Publisher
Springer
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
559 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0028-3940

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Sixty-nine patients with 91 separate abnormal findings were studied by both intra-arterial digital subtraction arteriography (ADSA) and conventional film screen subtraction arteriography (CFSA) in the same projection, with the same magnification. Digital subtraction arteriography has distinct advantages over CFSA in the form of reduced contrast utilization, better patient tolerance of arteriography because of reduced contrast concentration, superior contrast resolution, and rapid, on-line visualization of the abnormalities. Digital subtraction arteriography is limited by its availability in only a single plane, by decreased spatial resolution which affected the image quality for intracranial blood vessels at an image intensifier (I.I.) field of 12 inches, and by relatively limited field of view both intracranially and extracranially for I.I. fields of 6 and 9 inches.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of computed tomography and di
Comparison of computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography for preoperative evaluation of soft-tissue tumors of the limbs
✍ W. Crone-Münzebrock; S. Baake; G. Thoma; P. Müller; U. Rehder 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 610 KB

The preoperative results of computed tomography (CT) (n = 59) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 14) were compared with the intraoperative site and the pathological histological finding The tumor size was correctly estimated by CT in 69 % (difference less than 20 %), and overestimated in

Comparison of gadodiamide-enhanced MR an
Comparison of gadodiamide-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis: Results of a phase III multicenter trial
✍ Vesna D. Garovic; Manuela A. Achauer; Thomas Kittner; David Horák; Rubin Sheng; 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 172 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.1 mmol/kg gadodiamide administration for contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting hemodynamically relevant renal artery stenosis (RAS) when compared with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA‐DS

Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angio
Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Results of a phase III multicenter trial
✍ Bao T. Bui; Stephan Miller; Peter Mildenberger; Albert Sam II; Rubin Sheng 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 251 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.1 mmol/kg gadodiamide administration for contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE‐MRA) in detecting hemodynamically relevant main stenosis (ie, ≥50% or occlusion) of aortoiliac arteries. ## Materials and Methods In a mul