๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function

โœ Scribed by R. I. Hallan; D. E. M. M. Marzouk; D. J. Waldron; N. R. Womack; Professor N. S. Williams

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
361 KB
Volume
76
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Neural control of internal anal sphincte
Neural control of internal anal sphincter function
โœ D. Z. Lubowski; Mr. R. J. Nicholls; M. Swash; M. J. Jordan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 379 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views
Submucosal versus ligation excision haem
Submucosal versus ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy: A comparison of anal sensation, anal sphincter manometry and postoperative pain and function
โœ Mr. A. M. Roe; D. C. C. Bartolo; K. D. Vellacott; Jill Locke-Edmunds; N. J. Mcc. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 478 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Abstract Submucosal (SM) and ligation excision (LE) haemorrhoidectomy were compared to establish whether SM is a less painful procedure and whether anal sensation is better preserved by SM, and, if so, how this relates to postoperative function. There were 18 SM and 22 LE patients. Anal sphincter ma